Engage and Support Others

Management and Professional Staff Core Leadership Competencies


Descriptors

Click on the behaviours to see how this competency is demonstrated at different levels of proficiency. Competencies are not rated during the annual review. This information is provided to help employees and managers describe strengths and opportunities for development.

To establish and grow open and reciprocal relationships, understanding the importance of leveraging others to successfully achieve university objectives.

  1. Poor Level of Proficiency

    • May be shy, lack confidence, be intense, or be overly work oriented
    • Does not take the time to build rapport with colleagues
    • Freezes or panics in the face of conflict
    • Not good at cross boundary relations
    • Is solitary and not team oriented
    • Avoids or deals with conflict uncooperatively
    • Has effective relationships with certain, trusted or immediate colleagues
    • Participates in teamwork some of the time
    • May not take the initiative to connect with a wider circle of colleagues
    • Prefers to avoid conflict
    • Is easy to approach sometimes
  2. Expected Level of Proficiency

    • Relates well to all kinds of people within and outside the university
    • Builds appropriate rapport as well as trusting, effective relationships
    • Is seen as a cooperative team player
    • Encourages collaboration
    • Connects individuals to fulfill university objectives
    • Is always respectful, responsive, and diplomatic
    • Works effectively with a variety of people to achieve university goals
    • Ensures collaboration with others and the inclusion of new team members
    • Can defuse tense situations comfortably
    • Quickly finds common ground and solutions for all
    • Represents own interests and remains fair to other groups
  3. High Level of Proficiency

    • Recognized as a role model for relationship building
    • Coaches other who have difficulty establishing rapport
    • Fosters cooperative attitudes within and beyond the team or department
    • Works effectively within and across boundaries to achieve goals
    • Cultivates a win-win approach when there are different or competing interests
    • Reads situations and people quickly defusing potential conflict

To empower and enable others with appropriate authority and responsibility, and supporting their efforts to take responsibility.

  1. Poor Level of Proficiency

    • Lacks trust and respect in the talent of direct reports and/or others they may work with
    • Does most things themselves
    • May delegate but does not pass on authority
    • Does not communicate the bigger picture when assigning tasks or requesting help for staff or colleagues
    • May trust and respect staff or colleagues
    • Will delegate routine tasks
    • May keep important tasks and decisions to themselves
    • Provides basic communication to ensure the task is completed
  2. Expected Level of Proficiency

    • Clearly and comfortably assigns or requests help for both routine and important tasks and decisions with direct reports and/or project staff
    • Broadly shares responsibility and accountability
    • Trusts staff and/or colleagues to perform
    • Provides the resources for staff and colleagues to perform
    • Minimizes or removes barriers
    • Clearly and comfortably assigns or requests help for both routine and important tasks and decisions with direct reports and/or project staff
    • Broadly shares responsibility and accountability
    • Trusts staff and/or colleagues to perform
    • Provides the resources for staff and colleagues to perform
    • Minimizes or removes barriers
  3. High Level of Proficiency

    • Creates a climate in which people want to do their best
    • Can motivate many kinds of direct reports, team or project members
    • Provides exciting work and opportunities for direct reports and team members

Cultivate the development of one's-self and others through coaching, mentoring, personal and professional development, and supporting successful performance.

  1. Poor Level of Proficiency

    • Results driven and tactical
    • Does not see long-term development (of self or others) as their accountability
    • Prefers to select for talent than develop it (if managing)
    • Does not use the university development system or resources
    • Ensures short term development of self or direct reports to meet job requirements
    • May do an annual development plan
    • Does not coach or mentor colleagues or staff
  2. Expected Level of Proficiency

    • Takes on or encourages staff and/or project team members to take on work which stretch their skills and development
    • Holds frequent development discussions
    • Is aware of their own or their staff's career goals
    • Constructs and implements development plans using university resources
    • Coaches colleagues and/or staff to meet required job performance as needed
    • Develops staff and/or colleagues to take on significantly more challenging roles, projects, or tasks
    • Provides networking opportunities for staff and colleagues to learn, grow, and develop
    • Actively coaches and/or mentors colleagues and/or staff to higher levels of performance
  3. High Level of Proficiency

    • Can project the strengths and limitations of themselves or people within the university
    • Actively coaches and/or mentors colleagues and/or staff into more challenging university roles
    • Participates in or creates succession planning for their team or department