The exceptions are the papers (misnomer) originally published in electronic peer-reviewed journals. In these cases I have simply set pointers to the journals' own archives, which represent the most "authoritative" (another misnomer) versions available.
E-Publishing and Hypertext Publishing. A guest-editor's introduction to the first all-hypertext issue of EJournal. Discusses the changing roles of author, editor, publisher and text in the age of hypertext. This issue also features hypertext articles by Richard Andersen, John December and Charles Ess.
Stevan Harnad's Subversive Proposal: Kick Starting Electronic Scholarship Summarizes and critiques the current debate over the future of electronic journals, focussing principally on the conversation that Stevan Harnad began with his famous "subversive proposal."Papers on Rhetoric and Composition Studies
Using an Academic
Content
Seminar to Engage
Students with
the Culture of Academic Research.
A paper in the Journal
of the First Year Experience and Students in Transition 18(1) 2006:
23-54.
The paper reports a qualitatitative study of students in the Faculty
of Communication and Culture's First Year Seminars. It concludes
that a seminar offering the opportunity to work on an extended research
project is an important way of helping students absorb university
culture. It also concludes that much more research is needed on
academic content seminars as opposed to extended orientation seminars.
Is Anyone Listening? Writers Being (Mis)Read in the Academy This paper explores narratives of failure in responding to student writing: responses that send the wrong messages, that fail to accommodate the students' senses of themselves and how they fit into the academy, and that simply fail to help students learn. The paper addresses the social and institutional that help produce such failures and suggests ways of addressing them. (Co-written with Mary-Louise Craven, Margaret Procter and Jane Ledwell-Brown)
The
Researcher as Missionary: Problems with Rhetoric and Reform in the
Disciplines.
Judy Segal, Anthony Paré, Doug Brent, and Douglas Vipond.
Discusses the practical and ethical dilemmas faced by rhetoricians who
seek to inform the members of other discourse communities about the
practices
of those communities.
Rogerian
Rhetoric: An Ethical Alternative to Traditional Argumentation A
chapter
from Argument Revisited, Argument Redefined: Negotiating Meaning in
the Composition Classroom, ed Barbara Emmel, Paula Resch, and
Deborah
Tenny (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996). This chapter discusses Rogerian
rhetoric
and how it can be used in the classroom as an alternative or supplement
to the teaching of more traditional forms of argument. It focusses on
Rogerian
rhetoric more as a means of ethical enrichment than of persuasion in
the
traditional sense.
Writing Genres, Writing Classes, Writing Textbooks Uses genre theory (Bazerman, Miller) to analyse the genre of the textbook, particularly the composition textbook. I argue that composition textbooks represent a response to a socially constructed pedagogical situation that is largely devoid of social meaning, and present an alternative pedagogy in (adapted from Reither, Vipond and Hunt) in which knowledge is socially constructed by a class acting as a research community.
Why Does Rhetoric Need a Theory of Reading? Argues that, while three thousand years of rhetorical theory has provided solid theories of how persuasive discourse is composed, rhetoric needs to turn its attention to how persuasive discourse is processed by readers/hearers. Uses reader-response theories such as those of Rosenblatt and Iser and rhetorical theories such as those of Booth and Burke.
Young,
Becker and Pike's "Rogerian" Rhetoric: A Twenty-Year Reassessment
Assesses
Young, Becker and Pike's 1970 textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and
Change.
This book introduced the world of composition studies to a new,
supposedly
more co-operative rhetoric based on Carl Rogers' therapeutic
techniques.
The paper argues that, while Young, Becker and Pike's approach to
rhetoric
is dated and does not take into account modern phenomenological notions
of language, Rogerian rhetoric nonetheless offers a valid alternative
to
traditional argument.
Computer-Assisted Commenting and
Theories of Written Response.
The "computer assisted" part is completely obsolete now but I still
stand behind the theories of written response. I also think the
general lesson on automating education stands as well today as it did
in 1991.
Indirect Structure and Reader Response. An oldie (1985) but an often-reprinted goodie. Argues that "indirect structure," which is commonly cited in business communication texts as a way to buffer bad news, does not take account of the ways people really read and generally does more harm than good.
Short Papers, Texts of Oral Presentations, Works in Progress Academic Literacy Seminars. A presentation
to the 2004 Conference on the First-Year Experience. This paper
describes the University of Calgary's academically based first-year
seminars, and argues that first-year seminars based on academic content
are hugely under-reported and under-researched in the FYE
literature. The paper also reports some very preliminary results
of interviews that explore students' experience of research.
Same Roots, Different Soil: Rhetoric in a
Communications Studies Program. A chapter forthcoming in
Roger Graves and Heather Graves' Composition
in Canada. This
chaoter describes the unusual position of the University of Calgary's
writing program in a Communications Studies program rather than in an
English department. It discusses the troubled relationship
between rhetoric, media studies, and English studies in Canada and the
United States, and how this relationship has affected the University of
Calgary's program.
Writing Across the Disciplines: Politics
and Pedagogy.
An address to the University of Regina's Faculty of Arts on Writing
Across the Curriculum/Writing in the Disciplines (2003).
Creating an Academic Community of Discourse in the Classroom. A set of materials presented at the Laurentian University Writing Across the Curriculum Workshop. It consists mainly of course materials which formed the nucleus for discussion of how a classroom can be turned from a presentational device into an active research community.
Ideas
from the Writing Across the Curriculum Workshop A brief list of
tips
and techniques from a workshop at the University of Calgary.
(with Diana Brent) "Technologies of Resistance/Resisting Technology: Braille, Computers, and Literacy for the Visually Impaired." A paper presented to the Inkshed Working Conference #17, Bowen Island, May 2000.
Rogerian Rhetoric A short entry on Rogerian Rhetoric, from Theorizing Composition: A Critical Sourcebook of Theory and Scholarship in Contemporary Composition Studies, ed. Mary Kennedy.
In the Mirror of Genre: Students Write this World. A short hypertext based on a talk given at the Inkshed XVI conference, reporting the results of research-in-progress about how students read and write WWW genres.
Web Courseware Authoring Packages:
Some
Troubled Thoughts. A brief article in Inkshed.
Keeping the
"Literacy" in "Information Literacy." A brief article on the
convergence between Information Literacy and Writing Across the
Curriculum.
The
Politics of Writing in the Disciplines. A CCC presentation
that follows up on the article "Problems
with the Missionary Position," also on this page.